“Just remember; 50% is
a pass, 51% is a distinction.”
This was the joke to which we all clung at university when
we quaked at the thought of the three hour exam we were about to write. Now,
what if I change the sentence to: “Just remember, 30% is a pass, 31% is a
distinction”? It doesn’t sound like a joke, does it? It just sounds absurd. How
on earth does getting 30% as your final mark in a subject mean you pass, you
may ask. But that is exactly what you need to get in Matric (grade 12) in South
Africa at the moment to pass. Let me just make that clear – of your six
subjects in you final year of school, you need 30% in 3 subjects and 40% in 3
subjects to pass and receive your National Senior Certificate. And no, I am not
counting “Life Orientation” as a subject – I am focusing simply on the six main
academic subjects.
Each year the results are released I hang my head in shame,
because I know the figures. Half of the children who start grade 1 never finish
Matric. Of those who write Matric only some 70% pass. And, yet, again and again
it is reiterated that the pass rate is fair. With these words thousands of
students are made complacent into believing that only knowing 30% of your set
work is good enough. You do not need to aim for 100%. You do not even have to
aim for 50%. Only aim for 30% – and, don’t worry, your marks may even be
adjusted if it is deemed that the exam was too difficult! Aim for 30% - we
don’t expect more from you. By Jove! We don’t really think you could do better
anyway.
![]() |
| Everyone is exceptional... |
What worries me – truly worries me – is that generations of
students are leaving high school with a bar set so low that they do not believe
that they need to aim higher – and I do not mean this only academically. The
lowest bar is good enough. Just getting through on the minimum is good enough.
Lowering the bar to include everyone - God forbid anyone should feel ‘left out’
or that they ‘aren’t good enough’ or even have to exert themselves more than
the bare minimum – is, in fact, doing a disservice to those same students. I
also believe that the department is underestimating how great these students
can be. They are practically telling the students that they do not expect them
to be able to do better than these minimum standards. That 30% are the best
they can hope for, so why set the bar higher?
In grade 5 or 6 we read the book Stories from Different
Genres – a collection of short stories I enjoyed immensely. One story that
haunted me – even more than the sight in my mind’s eye of a man being eaten
alive by giant snails* - was
"Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., in which people had to wear
masks, weights and even have to hide their intelligence and talents so that
they would all be equal†. No one may be more beautiful, more
talented, or more intelligent than anyone else. The world sketched in that
story scared me more that all the horror tales in that book put together.
Yet the setting of such a low bar and telling people that it
is fine and dandy to scrape by is already creeping towards that mentality that
everyone should be included and that no one should feel that they had failed –
even when they haven’t even tried. From there it is not too far a jump to a
world where you are encouraged not to do your best.
These students go on to university or college and have to be
taught simple tasks like writing a paragraph – never mind writing an academic
essay. Having to do your own research is met by many (most?) simply cutting and
pasting badly written bits and pieces from unreliable websites. At the same
time, faculties are pushed to pass most, if not all the students in a class.
Again the bar is lowered. And again we are told that this is all well and good
and that, if you argue against this, it is you who are in the wrong and just
don’t want people to succeed. But what happens when these students enter the
workplace? Will they expect the bar to still be set at 30%? Will the least
amount of work be deemed “more than good enough” by them? Will mediocre be the
most they will strive to be? I truly hope that this is not the case.
*This story is The Quest for
the “Blank Claveringi” by Patricia
Highsmith. It was weird and gruesome and I loved it. Go figure.
† Do yourself a favour and read this classic
piece.
** This piece first appeared on Storylane. Some minor
changes were made before being published here.

No comments:
Post a Comment